Thursday, January 07th, 2010 | Author: KristenM  | 

Are you or someone you know a newbie to the world of Real Food? Learn the basics of how to transition to a more nutrient-dense diet with Kelly the Kitchen Kop's Real Food For Rookies E-Course. Skip the trial-and-error and go straight to being a real food expert in just 12 weeks! Hurry -- enrollment closes Sept 5th!

Is agave nectar good? Is agave nectar bad? Believe it or not, I thought I’d written a definitive post on this topic.

As it turns out, I hadn’t. Earlier this week a reader emailed me, seeking an answer to the classic question: Agave nectar — good or bad? She pointed out that she’d done a search for agave nectar on this site and only turned up two entries. In one, I’d said to avoid it. In another, I mentioned that I’d used agave nectar while experimenting with kombucha and didn’t enjoy the results.

So, she concluded: “Why, if agave nectar is a natural sweetener, should it not be used? What about it is bad? I’ve been preferring it to honey and maple syrup on my waffles, pancakes, and yogurt.”

I realized then that I needed to post a definitive guide to agave nectar, answering the question once and for all. This is it.

Agave Nectar: Good or Bad?

The short answer to that reader’s question is simple: agave nectar is not a “natural sweetener.” Plus, it has more concentrated fructose in it than high fructose corn syrup. Now, let’s get into the details.

Agave Nectar Is Not A Natural Sweetener

Once upon a time, I picked up a jar of “Organic Raw Blue Agave Nectar” at my grocery store. It was the first time I’d ever seen the stuff in real life, and the label looked promising. After all, words like “organic,” “raw,” and “all natural” should mean something. Sadly, agave nectar is neither truly raw, nor is it all natural.

Based on the labeling, I could picture native peoples creating their own agave nectar from the wild agave plants. Surely, this was a traditional food, eaten for thousands of years. Sadly, it is not.

Native Mexican peoples do make a sort of sweetener out of the agave plant. It’s called miel de agave, and it’s made by boiling the agave sap for a couple of hours. Think of it as the Mexican version of authentic Canadian maple syrup.

But this is not what agave nectar is. According to one popular agave nectar manufacturer, “Agave nectar is a newly created sweetener, having been developed in the 1990s.” In a recent article now posted on the Weston A. Price foundation’s website, Ramiel Nagel and Sally Fallon Morell write,

Agave “nectar” is not made from the sap of the yucca or agave plant but from the starch of the giant pineapple-like, root bulb. The principal constituent of the agave root is starch, similar to the starch in corn or rice, and a complex carbohydrate called inulin, which is made up of chains of fructose molecules.Technically a highly indigestible fiber, inulin, which does not taste sweet, comprises about half of the carbohydrate content of agave.

The process by which agave glucose and inulin are converted into “nectar” is similar to the process by which corn starch is converted into HFCS. The agave starch is subject to an enzymatic and chemical process that converts the starch into a fructose-rich syrup—anywhere from 70 percent fructose and higher according to the agave nectar chemical profiles posted on agave nectar websites.

Compare that to the typical fructose content of high fructose corn syrup (55%)!

In a different article, Rami Nagel quotes Russ Bianchi, managing director and CEO of Adept Solutions, Inc., a globally recognized food and beverage development company, on the similarities between agave nectar and high fructose corn syrup:

They are indeed made the same way, using a highly chemical process with genetically modified enzymes. They are also using caustic acids, clarifiers, filtration chemicals and so forth in the conversion of agave starches into highly refined fructose inulin that is even higher in fructose content than high fructose corn syrup.

So there you have it. Agave nectar is not traditional, is highly refined, and actually has more concentrated fructose than high-fructose corn syrup. It is not a “natural” sweetener. Thus far, the evidence definitely points toward the conclusion: Agave Nectar = Bad.

“But,” you ardent agave nectar enthusiasts say, “agave nectar has a low glycemic index. I’m a diabetic, and it’s the only sweetener I can use!”

What’s wrong with fructose?

First, we need to clarify something. Concentrated fructose is not found in fruit, or anywhere else in nature. When the sugar occurs in nature, it is often called “levulose” and is accompanied by naturally-occurring enzymes, vitamins, minerals, fiber, and fruit pectin.  Concentrated fructose, on the other hand, is a man-made sugar created by the refining process. To clarify:

Saying fructose is levulose is like saying that margarine is the same as butter. Refined fructose lacks amino acids, vitamins, minerals, pectin, and fiber. As a result, the body doesn’t recognize refined fructose. Levulose, on the other hand, is naturally occurring in fruits, and is not isolated but bound to other naturally occurring sugars. Unlike man-made fructose, levulose contains enzymes, vitamins, minerals, fiber, and fruit pectin. Refined fructose is processed in the body through the liver, rather than digested in the intestine. Levulose is digested in the intestine. (source)

I want you to pay special attention to those last two sentences, for they are a huge key that will help unlock the mystery of why fructose is bad for you.

Because fructose is digested in your liver, it is immediately turned into triglycerides or stored body fat. Since it doesn’t get converted to blood glucose like other sugars, it doesn’t raise or crash your blood sugar levels. Hence the claim that it is safe for diabetics.

But it isn’t.

That’s because fructose inhibits leptin levels — the hormone your body uses to tell you that you’re full. In other words, fructose makes you want to eat more. Besides contributing to weight gain, it also makes you gain the most dangerous kind of fat.

This has been verified in numerous studies. The most definitive one was released just this past year in the Journal of Clinical Investigation. The full study is available online, but for the sake of space I’m including Stephan’s (of Whole Health Source fame) summary here:

The investigators divided 32 overweight men and women into two groups, and instructed each group to drink a sweetened beverage three times per day. They were told not to eat any other sugar. The drinks were designed to provide 25% of the participants’ caloric intake. That might sound like a lot, but the average American actually gets about 25% of her calories from sugar! That’s the average, so there are people who get a third or more of their calories from sugar. In one group, the drinks were sweetened with glucose, while in the other group they were sweetened with fructose.

After ten weeks, both groups had gained about three pounds. But they didn’t gain it in the same place. The fructose group gained a disproportionate amount of visceral fat, which increased by 14%! Visceral fat is the most dangerous type; it’s associated with and contributes to chronic disease, particularly metabolic syndrome, the quintessential modern metabolic disorder (see the end of the post for more information and references). You can bet their livers were fattening up too.

The good news doesn’t end there. The fructose group saw a worsening of blood glucose control and insulin sensitivity. They also saw an increase in small, dense LDL particles and oxidized LDL, both factors that associate strongly with the risk of heart attack and may in fact contribute to it. Liver synthesis of fat after meals increased by 75%. If you look at table 4, it’s clear that the fructose group experienced a major metabolic shift, and the glucose group didn’t. Practically every parameter they measured in the fructose group changed significantly over the course of the 9 weeks. It’s incredible.

Back to our original question — Agave Nectar: Good or Bad?

The conclusion is clear. Agave nectar is bad for you. It’s not traditional, not natural, highly refined, and contains more concentrated fructose than high fructose corn syrup.

(photo by edgeplot)

Liked what you read? You may find these other posts interesting:

  1. Are Natural Sweeteners Good For You?
  2. 5 Mistakes Real Food Newbies Make
  3. On The Road to Being GMO-Free
  4. The Dangers of Splenda
  5. Sugar: The Bitter Truth




Enter your email address:





P.S. I go to great lengths to only advertise for products I enjoy and companies I believe in. That means that you're pretty much guaranteed to be happy buying from the sponsor below. Why not visit their site and check them out?





Category: Health & Nutrition |  | Print This Post
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
130 Responses
  1. Rebecca says:

    Thank you for this informative article about agave nectar! Can you infer why many health food vendors promote it and why it is associated with all-natural foods and beverage products? Maybe it was just successful target marketing…
    Rebecca´s last blog post …Drink Inside the Box- La Boite My ComLuv Profile

    • KristenM says:

      I think so. Alternative sweeteners are a big market, particularly ones that don’t immediately affect your blood sugar levels. But it wouldn’t be the first time something completely industrialized and non-healthy became a hit in the health-food community (think: soy).

    • Deb says:

      I’ve been shopping at health food stores since the mid-90’s and have seen many miracle foods come and go – these stores are just as likely to jump on a fad and make money off it as the mainstream stores are.
      Deb´s last blog post …Monthly Measure My ComLuv Profile

      • Chris says:

        Yeah, brown sugar was in fact once a “health food” item, saying it was purer and not at all like white sugar. In reality, it is white sugar with a little molasses added.

    • KristenM says:

      Esteban — I read the article you linked to when conducting my research. A couple of points:

      1) Even Madhava’s agave nectar is higher in fructose than high fructose corn syrup

      2) Madhava’s own website states that “Agave nectar is a newly created sweetener, having been developed during the 1990’s.”

      3) Even Madhava uses a refining process involving enzymes. So what if their particular process isn’t chemical? It’s still a highly refined sweetener, not “natural” at all.

      So, my conclusion is still true: Agave nectar is not a traditional food, not natural, and the fructose concentration in it is very dangerous for our health.

  2. Katie says:

    Esteban already said it, but I was under the impression that Rami Nagel’s writings had been pretty thoroughly debunked. He was completely correct about an agave product that was popular in the 90s, but it’s not the same product that is sold today. But I haven’t personally been to the agave nectar/syrup factories to see for myself, so I can’t say either way for certain.

  3. urusai says:

    > Unlike man-made fructose, levulose contains enzymes, vitamins, minerals, fiber, and fruit pectin. No, it does not. Rather, it comes along with those things when you eat fresh fruit.

    This comment was originally posted on Reddit

  4. Éireen says:

    Wow – very informative. Any thoughts about palm sugar (made from coconuts)?

  5. FJK says:

    I had no idea. I had been using it since I thought it was “better” for me. I have health issues that agave nectar would definitely worsen. THanks for the clear write up.
    I did notice it was becoming more widely available and that some brands include HFCS in the ingredients so I’ve gotten more careful about what one I purchased.
    FJK´s last blog post …2009 in Review — With Lots of Recipes and No Angst My ComLuv Profile

  6. Cyberdelia says:

    Wow–thanks for the post! Am a newer reader of your site & love it. While the agave info is interesting (I’ve never used it, and now won’t ever!), it’s the fructose part that really got my attention. Just made a few things “click.” Explains a lot to me. Great stuff. :)
    Cyberdelia´s last blog post …Quitting diet soda: Aspartame withdrawals My ComLuv Profile

  7. Meagan says:

    WOW – this is so great! Thank you for giving us the facts and saying it square. I have been wondering about this topic for a while but don’t have time to do oodles of research. Now I want to go throw all of mine out!
    Meagan´s last blog post …Cherry and White Chocolate Scones My ComLuv Profile

  8. Rachel B says:

    WTF? I keep reading that it’s low on the glycemic index and good for us. Maybe it depends on who is paying for the research. It’s so confusing.

    • KristenM says:

      Rachel B — Well it is low on the glycemic index because it contains such a high percentage of fructose. That’s spun by marketing people as being a good thing because it keeps your blood sugar levels more stable than something spiked with other refined sweeteners.

      That said, just because it has a low glycemic index doesn’t mean it’s healthy. It doesn’t mean it’s a real, traditional food that people have been consuming for thousands of years.

      It’s funny how the health food marketers demonize high fructose corn syrup for containing so much fructose, but then they worship agave nectar for containing even more fructose. They need to make up their minds. Which is it? Is highly concentrated fructose “natural” and “good” for you, or is it actually linked to increasing risks for heart disease & diabetes?

      Independent research has clearly shown concentrated fructose is dangerous. Plus we have the witness of nature and thousands of years of human diet. There are no examples of highly concentrated fructose in nature; any truly natural occurrence of fructose (i.e. levulose) is also joined with other vitamins, minerals, enzymes, and fiber that prohibits it from being digested in the liver. Plus, why would I want to eat a food that has only been around since the 1990s? Why would I want to experiment with my body, my health, my children’s health that way?

  9. I read up on agave syrup the first time someone mentioned it, and I knew right away that it was something to steer clear of. I wonder how many people would stop buying it if they did just the barest amount of research into it? As it is, I am annoyed at people for advertising it as being a health food, with special cook books, and the like to promote it. Thanks for such a detailed, well researched post, I learned a few bits that I didn’t know already.
    Ecologystudent´s last blog post …Why monocropping is a paradigm of failure for the farmer My ComLuv Profile

  10. Rachel B says:

    Hmmm, all this time I’ve been following Elana’s Pantry for what I thought were healthy gluten-free recipes and most call for agave. This is a real eye-opener for me.

  11. Chelsey says:

    This is what I was thinking all along. Thank-You researching into this matter.
    Chelsey´s last blog post …Tilapia Topped with Citrus Salsa My ComLuv Profile

  12. Thanks for posting this. I’ve heard some really negative information about fructose. The average diet a hundred years ago contained only a few daily grams of fructose sugar. With sodas, fruit juices and new sweeteners like agave nectar, that number is much, much higher now – which probably plays a large role in the rapidly increasing presense of disease in our society.
    Elizabeth @ The Nourished Life´s last blog post …Weight Loss Wednesday: What kind of weight do you want to lose? My ComLuv Profile

    • KristenM says:

      Elizabeth — You’re so very right! Statistics show that anywhere from 10-33% of the calories consumed in the average American’s diet comes from fructose. It’s downright ridiculous when you realize that naturally occurring fructose (levulose) was so very rare in traditional diets (fruits only available seasonally, etc.).

  13. Virginia says:

    Thanks for this article – I’ve been enjoying your blog for the last month or so – I was excited to see this post, and I’m really glad I read it. I had no idea about the full story of agave. Thank you so much!

  14. Amy says:

    When Wise Traditions published their article about agave earlier in 2009 I thought it was excellent, but you have done an even better job of stating the facts more clearly and more succinctly. This was an extremely informative article. I have never been on the bandwagon of agave, but never really knew enough to explain WHY. Your article makes it clear. And the few questions I had after reading, you answered here in the comments. Thanks for replying to your commenters — those little bits of info are valuable too!! Now I can forward this link to friends who tell me that in spite of the processing methods they will continue to use agave because they don’t get that “sugar rush”. Hopefully this will help make all of that clear. Thanks again.

    • KristenM says:

      Aw shucks, Amy. Thanks for the compliment. I’m always super-tempted to go back and add things to my posts after people bring up questions in the comments. Sometimes I do (like I did with my article on the Dangers of Soy), but other times I just assume people who are really curious will also read the discussion below.

  15. Lucy says:

    It would appear that agave is simply HFCS by another name……namely, high fructose CACTUS syrup!

  16. Chuck O says:

    Is there any alternatives you would recommend?

    Good Stuff as always!!

  17. Tracey R says:

    I run a menu planning service for those with metabolic syndrome and/or gluten-free eating who want to do a whole-foods, nutrient-dense and traditional nutrition approach. I don’t use a lot of sweeteners of any kind, but had to around Christmas and Thanksgiving, and for barbecue etc. What I normally use is stevia. Lo han guo is also good, but a lot more expensive and tends to have a maply taste–great in BBQ but not so much in Key Lime Cheesecake! Stevia also makes your body’s cells more sensitive to insulin, which is something they loose as your metabolic syndrome advances towards diabetes.

    Maybe someday I can go back to eating raw honey and local maple syrup, as two of my three kids can do. I know that in the last year of eating stevia, I’ve noticed I seem to be less insulin-resistant.
    Tracey R´s last blog post …Menu for The Week of January 9, 2010 My ComLuv Profile

  18. Martha says:

    Great informative post. Thank you!

  19. I’m at odds with your statements on fructose. Please look at these additional pieces of research to understand the whole picture, instead of spreading myths.

    1. Twenty-four-hour endocrine and metabolic profiles following consumption of high-fructose corn syrup-, sucrose-, fructose-, and glucose-sweetened beverages with meals.[American Journal of Clinical Nutrition May 2008] Stanhope KL, Griffen SC, Bair BR, Swarbrick MM, Keim NL, Havel PJ.

    2. No differences in satiety or energy intake after high-fructose corn syrup, sucrose, or milk preloads. .[American Journal of Clinical Nutrition December 2007] Soenen S, Westerterp-Plantenga MS

    3. Sugars and satiety: does the type of sweetener make a difference? [American Journal of Clinical Nutrition July 2007] Monsivais P, Perrigue MM, Drewnowski A.

    4. Effects of high-fructose corn syrup and sucrose consumption on circulating glucose, insulin, leptin, and ghrelin and on appetite in normal-weight women. [Nutrition February 2007] Melanson KJ, Zukley L, Lowndes J, Nguyen V, Angelopoulos TJ, Rippe JM.

    5. A critical examination of the evidence relating high fructose corn syrup and weight gain. [2007]

    6. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review.

    7. Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity. [Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004] Bray GA, Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM.
    Darcy S. O’Neil´s last blog post …Making Clear Ice – Part 2 of 3 My ComLuv Profile

    • KristenM says:

      Hi Darcy — A couple of thoughts.

      1) I’m not concerned with the immediate metabolic profiles of people consuming fructose. As I’ve already stated, it’s clear that fructose doesn’t raise blood glucose levels. What does concern me is what consumption of fructose does to metabolic processes after regular consumption for the long term. (And in this regard, I think the evidence is quite damning.)

      2) Even if fructose were totally sanctioned by every scientific study out there (which it isn’t), I’d still have qualms about consuming it in such unnatural amounts and ways. As I wrote in my post, concentrated fructose is not found in nature. It is not a traditional food that people have been eating for thousands of years. In nature, it always comes attached to things like fiber, pectin, vitamins, minerals, etc. These things cause nature’s fructose (which I refer to as “levulose” in my post so as to avoid confusing the two) to be digested in a way that’s not harmful to us, but rather according to our natural design.

  20. Ian says:

    Would like to second the question about what is the least-bad sweetener to put in my coffee or smoothie? Agave, refined sugar, “raw” sugar, brown sugar, honey, maple syrup? Stevia?

    • KristenM says:

      Ha(!) At least you’re on the right track when you ask for the “least bad” option instead of the best!

      I personally use fruit in smoothies. If none of my fruits are particularly sweet, I might add a dab of raw honey.

      In coffee, I add sucanat (about the least refined sugar you can buy in the U.S.).

      In tea, I mix in stevia leaves with my tea leaves and find that’s generally sufficient. Most of the time I don’t sweeten my tea at all, but some teas really call for it.

      The “why” for all these sweeteners has to do with how their tastes blend with the particular beverage I’m drinking. I don’t like honey in my coffee, for example, although some people do.

      Hope this helps!

  21. Ian says:

    Yes it does help, thanks!

  22. tina says:

    I use raw honey when a sweetener is needed. The exception is ice cream. I use palm sugar for my homemade ice cream. What are your thoughts on palm sugar?

  23. “Think of it as the Mexican version of authentic Canadian Vermont maple syrup.”

    :)

    I’ve never heard of agave before so I’ll stick with honey and Vermont maple syrup since we can produce those.

  24. Hmm… the strike out for Canadian HTML didn’t work… :)

  25. another wonderfood bites the dust.

    This comment was originally posted on FriendFeed

  26. lisa says:

    What are your thoughts on brown rice syrup?

  27. Anna says:

    Great post! I ruffled a lot of feathers the past two years in person and online when I told people agave syrup was bad news, but frankly, most people don’t want their bubble burst. Ignorance is bless, eh? When it comes to concentrated sugars of any source, there is simply no “free lunch”.

    Concentrated fructose is metabolized by the liver much the same as alcohol. Dr. Lustig has a great lecture video on YouTube that explains in very easy language the biochemistry of fructose metabolism in the liver (table sugar is 50% glucose/50% fructose – after separation the glucose goes into the blood stream and cells and the fructose goes to the liver and is turned into triglycerides – fat). I love Dr. Lustig’s phrase “beer without the buzz”. If the parents who serve their kids agave, sugar, HFCS sweetened beverage (or “100% fruit juice”) only knew how much that concentrated sugar stresses their kids’ livers… essentially creating human foie gras.

  28. I haven’t gotten around to saying it yet, so: Thanks, Kristen! I don’t use agave syrup – just never got into it, really. It’s so good to have an analysis all summed up like this.

    -Dan
    Psychic Lunch´s last blog post …Not all foods are superfoods! My ComLuv Profile

  29. dotslady says:

    I’m a fat celiac, not diabetic (yet) who experimented with agave when it came out (raw food recipe: cocoa powder, agave, avocado): my blood glucose soared. No more agave. I was very confused by the hype all these years, so THANK YOU KRISTEN for backing up my own “science.” I’m amused by people and their penchant for sweets, and how far they’ll go to get it disguised by any other name. I have learned to live without sugars (except some good old fruit once in a while).

  30. Szig says:

    Thank you for the link on agave nectar. I have totally thought it was the maple syrup of Mexico and now I’ve got two bottles to get rid of. I feel like Trader Joe’s has mislead me!

    This comment was originally posted on shelterrific

  31. Catherine Rott ND, DNM says:

    I need someone to comment on the fact that tequila is made from blue agave…how does this relate? http://www.blueagaverestaurant.com/tequila.html
    My son, who is a bartender, said that folks usually have a much worse hangover from tequila than from other liquors. Could this be a reason? Thanks in advance.

  32. Megan B. says:

    I feel ya on the agave, Szig. I’m still not sure about it’s health benefits myself, but I’ll still use it in my vegan baking because it’s a great honey substitute. I just try and take it easy on the sweet stuff, no matter what…

    This comment was originally posted on shelterrific

  33. Stephanie says:

    I really enjoyed this article… I myself have been buying raw agave from Wholesome Sweeteners. I checked their web site and it states that their production process is to heat the liquid collected from the agave pina’s until it turns from inulin to fructose, then it’s carbon-filtered, and then filtered through diatomaceous earth (interesting, I use that stuff to kill slugs in the garden! :-) ). I do recognize that this might be one of those situations where they’re just telling part of the story, but if this truly is the process, it doesn’t sound too bad to me… that being said, I have always considered agave to be more or less the same as sugar. I like the way it tastes.
    Stephanie´s last blog post …Snack? My ComLuv Profile

  34. Kris says:

    I just called Wholesome sweetner and their response was, that they process it with no chemicals. They are certified organic and cannot use chemicals. And that there is an article that has been recycled from the 90’s and it is not true. There processing plant is in Mexico, are we able to trust that??

    • KristenM says:

      Kris — Even companies that process it with no chemicals need to process it with enzymes in order to break the inulin down into fructose. It’s still refined, still not something you could make in your own kitchen, still higher in fructose than high fructose corn syrup, and still not a traditional food.

  35. RadiantLux says:

    It is sad because the stuff is really yummy. I read Dr. Mike Eades’ post, where said “avoid it like death”. (http://www.proteinpower.com/drmike/saturated-fat/food-trends-from-expo-west/)

    “Agave
    Agave was the big new product this year. Last year there were a few vendors; this year they were everywhere. They were selling agave syrup, agave nectar, agave crystals, agave this and agave that. An entire other group of vendors was promoting various products sweetened with agave. For those of you who don’t know, agave is the latest entry into the caloric-sweetener sweepstakes. It comes in a variety of forms – syrup, nectar, crystals – from the agave plant, a succulent plant found mainly in Mexico. The claim to fame of this sweetener, which was emblazoned on banners, literature, labels and just about everywhere, is that it is a low-glycemic sweetener. And it is was being touted as a great food for diabetics and any others with glucose-intolerance problems. And it is indeed low-glycemic because it is composed of about 90 percent fructose. If you think high-fructose corn syrup is bad at 55 percent fructose, just imagine what Agave syrup can do for you. Yet all these ignorant people are ga ga over it as if it were the second coming. My advice is to avoid it like death. But be prepared to be seeing it everywhere.”

    Still, it wasn’t enoough for me. Your post explained fructose, compared it to HFCS and that it is really a processed food. Sometimes I have to read things more than once, in many places to really believe it.
    Thanks!

  36. theweblady says:

    Thank you so much for posting this! It bums me out but I would have never known this if it wasn’t because of your article. Thanks for giving us the better options too! Succanat and Stevia will now replace my Agave.

  37. Ms. Davis says:

    Thanks so much for the informative article. My nutritionist told me this, so I’m glad to see that the word is getting out to the public that are interested! Who wants to add more weight & problems to those we already have!!!

  38. Newfiegirl says:

    Great article! As a nurse working with people with liver disease I found this very interesting esp the fatty visceral deposit issue!!

  39. maria says:

    Thank you for your informative article on Agave Nector.

    We have a question about inulin after reading the article on whether it is OK or just a way companies are hiding HFCS. The new Kirkland yogurt made by Dannon doesn’t have HFCS or artificial sweetener but does have inulin. We mix it with a plain yogurt to lower the sugar we are getting. What is your opinion?

  40. Jess says:

    I do a lot of baking and use agave in many of my goodies (because it doesn’t involve any animal cruelty like honey does). I recently had a friend say that he heard a rumor that agave was “as bad as HFCS,” so I began researching it. Of course, I have found approximately the same number of pieces of information on both sides of the issue, so I’m still not sure what to believe.

    So, in an attempt to attain some clarification on this issue, do you have any comments, for instance, on the Sweetener Comparison Chart found here? http://blog.xagave.com/the-truth-about-agave-it-is-a-great-alternative-to-sugar-honey-and-other-natural-sweeteners/

    Thanks!

  41. Curious says:

    I’m wondering what you think about Stevia? I’ve tried finding something about it on your website. Trying to get all this straight.

    Thanks!

  42. I’ve noticed that agave syrup is being used in an increasing number of ‘health’ foods. Be just to check labels – you might be surprised to find that it’s in some of the foods that you buy – foods that used to contain honey or other traditional sweeteners.

    I was given the supposedly best brand of agave syrup, mentioned in one of the comments here, and I didn’t care for the taste or mouth feel so it has not been tempting for me to eat it. I tend to side with the anti-agave position, but I would like to see more studies on fructose consumption in humans – well designed tightly controlled metabolic ward studies to make sure that people truly are being compliant with the foods that are being tested.
    Lillea Woodlyns´s last blog post …Gluten Free Oats? My ComLuv Profile

  43. Chris says:

    OMG!!! I’ve been using agave for a few months now and am hunting down a store receipt to take a brand new bottle of back first thing in the morning….

  44. Christy says:

    Kristen, what about brown rice syrup as an alternative to sugar?

  45. Elise says:

    L O V E this article, a great summary on the myths/truths behind agave! Will be sharing this with everyone I know! :)
    Elise´s last blog post …Nut & Seed Protein Bars My ComLuv Profile

  46. Rhonda says:

    Great article, read it while sitting with my tea sweetened with agave nectar in front of me. Dumped the tea, made a new cup with local honey. I’m passing this along to everyone I know!

  47. Kyle says:

    Perhaps clarification of the use of agave as a “non-traditional” food source would be helpful. The Aztecs, the Toltecs before them and the Olmecs before them (were going back thousands of years here) have been eating the juice of agave – they do indeed call it nectar down there – in various forms (usually fermented) for thousands of years. For you Nourishing/Wise Tradition fans – one of the most common forms is pulque, which ferments naturally from wild cultures and has an alcohol content similar to beer. Others used naturally occurring enzymes to stabilize it as well as boiling as Kristen mentioned. All are various types of processing, things humans have done to food for millennia. There are over 200 species of agave and seemingly as many ways to prepare it and use it as a food, drink or fiber. Agave was the first major crop the Spaniards grew after the conquest of the Aztecs; not for the nectar but for the fiber (sisal) – to make rope. This crop gave birth to slavery in the Americas (the Mayans were the first slaves). Sisal proved to be far superior to the Manila fiber they had been using.

  48. Lisa says:

    Thank you so much for this informative article on Agave Nectar! I started buying it a few months ago, and have gone through a bottle and a half. I’ve not used it in excess…maybe two teaspoons at a time, but still! I will not be using it anymore, but I really appreciated the explanation about why it’s touted as having a low glycemic load in the body and how it gets processed differently from glucose and actually causes triglycerides to be formed and causes our body to store the bad type of fat! Thanks, again!!! Wow..

  49. Christine says:

    I too thought it was a reasonable thing to use – then I started to research it and decided not to use it anymore. The defining moment, however was a friend’s daughter has type 1 diabetes – they used a small amount in a recipe that they had made before but with raw honey – her sugar went through the roof and it took them hours to get it back down. Scary stuff. No thanks.
    Christine´s last blog post …I Never Knew I Needed an iPad My ComLuv Profile

  50. Vast Majority says:

    The article is a little misleading. Not all Agave Nectars have a fructose level greater than the typical HFCS. Check out this chart: http://www.globalgoods.com/agavenectar.html

    Even plain table sugar metabolises to about 50% fructose. Some Agave Nectars have less than that!

    Nevertheless, some Agave Nectar is very very bad, but not all.

  51. Vast Majority says:

    Oh, and additionally, not all Agave Nectar uses chemicals in their production process:

    The Volcanic Nectar Brand is Organic, Kosher, and Raw and uses the following process:
    The leaves are removed from the plant which bares the base of the plant 1/2 above and 1/2 below the ground. The agave base is then removed and taken to a facility to where it is heated to no more than 118 degrees F to get the juices flowing. The base or ball of the plant is then chopped up, filtered, sent through a centrifuge and poured into the bottles you get today. There are other less expensive ways to produce the agave in a faster way, but Volcanic Nectar prefers the more traditional methods for health reasons.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>