Get a FREE copy of my report The 7 Most Shocking Things the Health Food Industry
Will Never Tell You
+ my newsletter AND special health deals!

Judge Sides With Monsanto, Ridicules Organic Farmers

On February 24, Judge Naomi Buchwald handed down her ruling on a motion to dismiss in the case of Organic Seed Growers and Trade Assn et al v. Monsanto after hearing oral argument on January 31st in Federal District Court in Manhattan. She ruled to dismiss the case brought against Monsanto on behalf of organic farmers, seed growers and agricultural organizations. Their goal? To protect themselves from patents Monsanto holds on genetically-modified seeds. 83 plaintiffs joined the suit, representing more than 300,000 members. To say they are disappointed in Judge Buchwald’s decision to dismiss the case is an understatement.

Plaintiff lead attorney Daniel Ravicher said,

“While I have great respect for Judge Buchwald, her decision to deny farmers the right to seek legal protection from one of the world’s foremost patent bullies is gravely disappointing. Her belief that farmers are acting unreasonable when they stop growing certain crops to avoid being sued by Monsanto for patent infringement should their crops become contaminated maligns the intelligence and integrity of those farmers. Her failure to address the purpose of the Declaratory Judgment Act and her characterization of binding Supreme Court precedent that supports the farmers’ standing as ‘wholly inapposite’ constitute legal error. In sum, her opinion is flawed on both the facts and the law. Thankfully, the plaintiffs have the right to appeal to the Court of Appeals, which will review the matter without deference to her findings.”

Monsanto’s history of aggressive investigations and lawsuits brought against farmers in America have been a source of concern for organic and non-GMO farmers since Monsanto’s first lawsuit brought against a farmer in the mid-90’s. Since then, 144 farmers have had lawsuits brought against them by Monsanto for alleged violations of their patented seed technology. Monsanto has brought charges against more than 700 additional farmers who have settled out-of-court rather than face Monsanto’s belligerent litigious actions. Many of these farmers claim to not have had the intention to grow or save seeds that contain Monsanto’s patented genes. Seed drift and pollen drift from genetically engineered crops often contaminate neighboring fields. If Monsanto’s seed technology is found on a farmer’s land without contract they can be found liable for patent infringement.

“Family farmers need the protection of the court,” said Maine organic seed farmer Jim Gerritsen, President of lead plaintiff OSGATA. “We reject as naïve and undefendable the judge’s assertion that Monsanto’s vague public relations ‘commitment’ should be ‘a source of comfort’ to plaintiffs. The truth is we are under threat and we do not believe Monsanto. The truth is that American farmers and the American people do not believe Monsanto. Family farmers deserve our day in court and this flawed ruling will not deter us from continuing to seek justice.”

The plaintiffs brought this suit against Monsanto to seek judicial protection from such lawsuits and challenge the validity of Monsanto’s patents on seeds.

“As a citizen and property owner, I find the Order by the Federal Court to be obsequious to Monsanto,” said plaintiff organic farmer Bryce Stephens of Kansas. “The careless, inattentive, thoughtless and negligent advertisement Monsanto has published on their website to not exercise its patent rights for inadvertent trace contamination belies the fact that their policy is in reality a presumptuous admission of contamination by their vaunted product on my property, plants, seeds and animals.”

“Seeds are the memory of life,” said Isaura Anduluz of plaintiff Cuatro Puertas and the Arid Crop Seed Cache in New Mexico. “If planted and saved annually, cross pollination ensures the seeds continue to adapt. In the Southwest, selection over many, many generations has resulted in native drought tolerant corn. Now that a patented drought tolerant corn has been released how do we protect our seeds from contamination and our right to farm?”

A copy of Judge Buchwalds ruling is located here.

The body of the post is drawn from a press release issued by OSGATA.

About OSGATA: The Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association is a not-for-profit agricultural organization made up of organic farmers, seed growers, seed businesses and supporters. OSGATA is committed to developing and protecting organic seed and it’s growers in order to ensure the organic community has access to excellent quality organic seed free of contaminants and adapted to the diverse needs of local organic agriculture.

Print Friendly
Sharing Is Rebellious! ENJOY.

The following two tabs change content below.
I am a passionate advocate for REAL FOOD -- food that's sustainable, organic, local, and traditionally-prepared according to the wisdom of our ancestors. I'm also an author and a nutrition educator. I enjoy playing in the rain, a good bottle of Caol Ila scotch, curling up with a page-turning book, sunbathing on my hammock, and watching my three children explore their world.
STANDARD FTC DISCLOSURE: In order for me to support my blogging activities, I may receive monetary compensation or other types of remuneration for my endorsement, recommendation, testimonial and/or link to any products or services from this blog. Please note that I only ever endorse products that are in alignment with Food Renegade's ideals and that I believe would be of value to my readers. You may read my full disclosure statements here.

10 Responses to Judge Sides With Monsanto, Ridicules Organic Farmers
  1. Percy Black
    February 27, 2012 | 8:41 pm

    Ask Monsanto employees whether they go along with their employer. If they have kids, do they feel safe feeding them foods grown from altered seeds.

  2. Judy
    February 27, 2012 | 10:16 pm

    The organic farmers should be able to sue for monsato’s garbage landing in there fields

  3. AmandaLP
    February 27, 2012 | 11:28 pm

    What is scary is that Monsanto is trying to create seed monopolies. With their buying of Seminis, they now own several varieties of “heirloom” seeds.

    While these are not GMO seeds, if you have bought these varieties since 2005, you paid money to Monsanto. And, if you buy conventional produce, those seeds may have come from Monsanto, GMO or not.

  4. Allison
    February 27, 2012 | 11:31 pm

    If I was a lawyer (which I’m not– not even close), this is how I would prosecute Monsanto:

  5. Vanessa
    February 28, 2012 | 11:58 am

    So sad. Seems like they have this judge in their back pocket, too. I can’t understand how the law would side with a conglomerate that is contaminating other farmers products, hurting their opportunities to make a living selling what they belive in to be healthy, whole food. WTF?? There must be something I’m missing. I’ll have to read more about this when I have some time. Does it really come down to a company winning because they have more money and power? Really unfortunate.

  6. Jasper
    February 28, 2012 | 8:24 pm

    I believe that this and other judges are, in fact, employed (previously or currently) by the large conglomerates to protect the corporate interest to make $$ – not the people’s.

    Members of our government, elected or not, need to be thoroughly screened – as we do with juries – before being allowed to preside over any case they may have. Otherwise, they are never impartial.

  7. Tom
    February 28, 2012 | 9:48 pm

    Why am I getting a 404 page when clicking on the www osgata dot org link at the end of the post?

    • KristenM
      February 28, 2012 | 10:30 pm

      Thanks for telling me the link was broken! I fixed it.

  8. Nidster
    February 29, 2012 | 4:49 pm

    This report in The Independant speaks volumes:
    “The Independent newspaper reports that there is a notice in the cafeteria of the Monsanto pharmaceutical factory is High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, advising customers “as far as practicable, GM soya and maize (has been removed) from all food products served in our restaurant. We have taken the steps to ensure that you, the customer, can feel confident in the food we serve. The notice was posted by the Sutcliffe Catering Group.”

  9. Marcin
    February 29, 2012 | 11:20 pm

    Why my comment was removed? Are you censoring the posts now?

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Who Am I?

My name is Kristen Michaelis. I'm a nutrition educator, author, and mother of three. I adore hats, happy skirts, horizons full of storm clouds, the full-bodied feel of wind as I ride motorcylces, reading in my hammock, and a hearty shot of Caol Ila scotch. I'm also a rebel with a cause.
Food Renegade October Giveaway