Thursday, August 13th, 2009 | Author: KristenM  | 

Imitation Food Labeling Laws Real Food

I’m looking at a book. It’s the kind of book you’d pick up in an antique store, take home, and treasure — not just because of it’s yellowed pages and delicate binding, but because of it’s utterly fascinating content. It’s called Graded Lessons in Physiology and Hygiene, and it’s a textbook used in the Texas schools in 1908.

I’ve been thumbing through the book for weeks, marveling at just how much common sense knowledge we’ve lost when it comes to food and health. Before people began putting their trust in the government, diet dictocrats, and food manufacturers to tell them what to eat, they actually experienced an acute connection with their food that enabled them to make wise judgments about what is and is not healthful based merely on accumulated personal observations.

Graded Lessons was written by a physician, Dr. William Khron, and his wisdom is striking considering that he was probably trained at the end of the nineteenth century, at a time when there were no real ways to monitor internal bodily functions.

For example, he knew that “excessive amounts of sugar cause the liver to be overworked and a bilious attack results” (page 37).

He knew that excessive starch should be avoided and that vegetable oils were not healthy. “The cereals, as oats, corn, and rice, are chiefly starch. Rice contains about ninety percent starch. Corn contains more fat than the other grains, but all vegetable fat is hard to digest, and is of little value as food” (page 34).

But perhaps the most astonishing and affirming thing about Khron’s textbook is how ardent he is in defending Real Food — and how dominant his view was in the culture write large. He wrote the textbook just at the time when margarine was undercutting butter and beginning to rapidly increase its market share, and only three years before vegetable shortening would do the same thing to lard.

Check out this choice quotation on what he calls “adulterated foods”:

“Many of our foods are sometimes spoiled by persons who manufacture or sell them, putting into them cheaper substances that are dangerous to health. Such persons seem to care little for the purity of foods, but are chiefly interested in making the most money possible out of them. So common has this adulteration become that in most of the states the law-making power has passed pure food bills to prevent the sale of such adulterated articles. These laws are most worthy and should be strictly enforced, for what is money-making by a few individuals compared with the health of the people of an entire city or state, which may be greatly endangered by the use of these impure or adulterated foods” (page 38)?

Notice how riled up he is, how his view clearly dominates the political landscape, and how he loathes the idea that people should make money adulterating foods at the expense of a society’s health. Is it just me, or do you wish our own food climate were so inhospitable to fake foods?

He goes on to list some adulterated foods — foods he warned about back in 1908, but which are sadly accepted as commonplace today:

“Sugar, syrup, and candy are sometimes made from corn by a peculiar process, by means of which the starch of the corn is changed into glucose, and a kind of sugar not so sweet or healthful as sugar made from sugar-cane or sugar beets. This sugar is quite apt to ferment, or sour, and decay within the bowels, thus causing disease. Some candies are colored with poisonous matter” (page 39).

“Butter is sometimes made entirely from … cotton-seed oil, to which coloring matter is added to make it look like pure, yellow butter made of rich cream. This product is called butterine, or oleomargarine. It can be sold for about half of what good butter would bring…. In the United States there is a law against the sale of butterine that is not stamped to show plainly to the person buying it that it is not genuine butter, but an imitation. Such laws are right in protecting the people against false or counterfeit foods, and in preventing people from being imposed upon” (page 39).

“Baking powder is impure, being adulterated by the addition of alum. Baking powder containing alum may be injurious” (page 40).

“You know how homemade jams and preserves taste. They are wholesome foods. When made from the pure juices of fruits and pure sugar they are expensive. On this account much jam sold at a low price is made from a brittle, glue-like substance called gelatine, to which acids are added, besides some unhealthful coloring matter to make them look like the pure jams made at home from currants, strawberries, grapes, and other fruits” (page 40).

Did you recognize these everyday foods? Corn syrup. Artificial colorings. Margarine. Baking Powder made with alum. Jelly.

Isn’t it amazing that these were once so demonized for being adulterated imitations of the real thing? In fact, in 1938 the widespread abuse of these foods caused the United States congress to actually pass the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act which required that the word “imitation” appear on any food that was an imitation.

This law was in effect until 1973 when the food industry finally succeeded in getting the law tossed out.

Perhaps you’re old enough to remember buying American cheese back when it was called “imitation cheese” instead of a “cheese food product.” Maybe you remember seeing margarine labeled as “imitation butter” or jelly labeled as “imitation jam.”

Not any more.

Now an entire array of fake food products fills our grocery stores. To quote Joel Salatin’s expression of pure poetry, most foods sold these days are “irradiated, amalgamated, prostituted, reconstituted, adulterated, modified, and artificially-flavored, extruded, bar-coded, un-pronounceable things.”

I want to return to an age when our dominate culture understands food the way it did a mere 100 years ago. And I share Salatin’s optimism when he says, “I do think that the world we currently live in is a veritable blip, an abnormality cyst, in the continuum of human history. Chances are in the distant if not near future our food system will be more decentralized, localized, and in-home prepared than it is right now. And that looks a lot more like the food system of 1800 than the one of 2009.”

May it be!

This post is participating in today’s Fight Back Fridays blog carnival, hosted right here at Food Renegade. If you want to check out other articles, stories, news, and recipes relating to Real Food, go check it out.

Liked what you read? You may find these other posts interesting:

  1. Butter vs. Margarine Showdown
  2. Rocket Fuel Found In Baby Formula
  3. Food Scare Of The Week
  4. Agave Nectar: Good or Bad?
  5. On The Road to Being GMO-Free




Enter your email address:





P.S. I go to great lengths to only advertise for products I enjoy and companies I believe in. That means that you're pretty much guaranteed to be happy buying from the sponsor below. Why not visit their site and check them out?





Category: Food Politics & Philosophy, Real Food |  | Print This Post
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
40 Responses
  1. When I asked my mother about the foods her parents ate (she is 80 now) she talked about white flour and ‘butterine.’ She said more than one third of the meals she ate as a child were beans and white biscuits. I had to go back even further than that, to what her grandparents ate before finding any real food. These methods, foods and stories are being lost at a rate faster than we are rediscovering them. Thanks for posting this last-century wisdom before it was lost!
    .-= Local Nourishment

  2. Shannon says:

    What I think is really sad is my grandparents generation. They are nearly 90, were dairy farmers who wouldn’t even think to *not* put their cows in the pasture. They drank fresh milk, ate steaks so many times my dad said “we used to come home and say ‘oh man, steak again!’”

    Their generation was inundated with all of the new fangled garbage foods. My grandma can’t even look at dairy without getting sick anymore because of all of the low-fat pasteurization/homogenization that has done her in. She is convinced that she can not grow apples unless their is a chemical involved. They now rent their land out to monocroppers who probably get paid *not* to grow anything – they are in the land of corn and soy after all.

    So sad, but because they had many years of real food they’ve been fairly health compared to my generation who was born into it in the ’80s.
    .-= Shannon

  3. Nicole D says:

    If anyone is interested in reading the book above, Google library has it for download: http://books.google.com/books?id=KZhsieYZAsEC&oe=UTF-8

  4. Thanks for the download link. I was just thinking, how can I get that book? The man’s intuition is amazing! Then again, he is looking at things from a different angle than most do today. His world is flip-flopped from ours. How I wish this was not the case. Like you, I say of Joel Salatin’s optimism – Let it be!
    .-= Wardeh @ GNOWFGLINS

  5. tina says:

    I don’t even know what to say. I get so emotional (angry) when I realize how aldulterated our food has become. It’s so frustrating. I’ve spend much time getting nourishing foods for my family but my heart breaks for those who don’t know about good, nourishing foods.

  6. tina says:

    “This sugar is quite apt to ferment, or sour, and decay within the bowels, thus causing disease.”

    Kristin, I have a question about the above quote. Fermenting sugar is bad but fermented foods and drinks are good. I know there is a difference but can you explain what it is, please?

    Thanks!

  7. Great post– I’d love to get my hands on a copy of that book. I too plan to ask my grandparents (lifelong farmers) to impart their real food wisdom, and to teach me how to make preserves, can tomatoes, etc., while they still can! When they still had their apple orchard, the whole family used to gather to help make cider… it was so pure and delicious… nothing I’ve found since then even remotely compares. Even the cider sold at my local farmer’s market is now pasturized!

    And as for the current legislation that is meant to “protect” us and keep our food supply safe, I wish we could go back to the (simpler and stricter) PFDA of 1906, which was a response to the atrocities uncovered by Teddy Roosevelt and Upton Sinclair. The contradictions and loopholes in the FFDCA of 1938 (and it’s subsequent amendments) range from troubling to downright alarming! What’s sad, though, is that food is the most closely regulated of the bunch. But because we have a reactionary government, stricter standards and safety measures are (usually) only approved after something tragic happens.
    .-= ChicaGoinGreen

  8. KristenM says:

    ChicaGoinGreen — The worst thing about the new laws is that they’re intentionally designed to provide a lot of crushing oversight to the smallest (and safest!) producers, rather than the food behemoths.

    Tina — Fermenting sugar creates alcohol, which destroys good gut bacteria & enzymes and causes bad bacteria to multiply. The fermenting of vegetables & dairy creates lots of beneficial bacteria & enzymes used to preserve the food & keep your digestion in good working order.

    Shannon — I feel you pain. I know several people who grew up on old-fashioned dairy farms, eating & drinking the freshest foods imaginable. Then they were sold on industrial foods not only by convenience, but by the promises of modern science. They’re a generation of people with implicit trust in science — doctors, pharmaceutical companies, research laboratories, technology. Anything science declares can not be questioned, but must be whole heartedly embraced. Never mind that all these scientists are simply — like anyone in any industry — out to turn a profit, not necessarily look out for the best interests of individuals. Never mind that these scientists ONLY make money when you’re SICK, so they have a vested interest in keeping you that way! Never mind that science isn’t as objective as enlightenment idealists hoped it would be, and is as subjective as the people designing the experiments and interpreting the results. So, if science says margarine is safer, healthier, and more nourishing for you then butter, then by golly it is! Truly tragic.

  9. Kristen says:

    I have been doing my own research on this in Ottawa, Ontario Canada. I am trying to find books that have recipes of food from up to 1000 years ago. It is very rare to find a book like the one you did, impressive. I actually found one relating to the paleolithic age. It says people are pretty much the same as they were 10,000 years ago except for the way we eat and live. People didn’t die from cancer, diabetes or heart disease, they were eaten by tigers if they didn’t run fast enough. Our bodies were meant to move not just 20 minutes a day but almost all day long.

  10. AnnMarie Deis says:

    It sounds like a beautiful book! I tried to search for it at my library’s database as well as searching for it at Amazon.com, with no luck at either. Would you know how to obtain a copy of the title?

  11. Anna says:

    Adulteration of food isn’t new. Some of the oldest laws in existence (pre-New World) are food purity laws, because after agriculture became widespread, specialization of labor and growth of urban populations often meant someone else was preparing food for the masses (& profit). Temptation to cut corners seems to be a long-standing human trait that requires regulation and inspection.

    Another very good book to read from that era is the classic 1906 novel The Jungle by Upton Sinclair, which exposed the corruption of the US meat packing industry. There are still a lot of parallels to today, unfortunately.

  12. Ren says:

    Fascinating article, Kristen! I wouldn’t be surprised in the least to find that Michael Pollan is descended from Dr. Krohn.
    .-= Ren

  13. Weston Price’s work is another major example of how much common sense we’ve lost sight of over the years. His work was published in the 1930s and clearly hasn’t had the influence it should have. In my opinion, it shows the unfortunate reality of how powerful the influence from big industry is. I certainly hope Salatin is right and that it will happen soon enough for us to see it in our lifetime.
    .-= Vin – NaturalBias

  14. Ryan says:

    Your book is a great find! When we had our first child, I did extensive research on nutrition and food to ensure we were the healthiest possible and feeding our children the best food possible. It’s amazing how so much vital information from generations past is ignored or lost. With many hours of research on the internet and talking with several people, we’re able to provide our kids the proper nutrition and best foods available. We can already see the benefits in our children’s behaviour, energy and intelligence.
    .-= Ryan

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>